论文下载网-提供最全的论文下载服务

摘要
      当今社会，绩效管理的理念在企业中的应用己深入人心，并取得了良好的效果，但在大学里绩效管理尚处于绩效考核阶段。目前大学是我国最重要的一个科研研究主体，其研究水平，研究程度始终处于科技发展的前沿，是提升国家整体科研实力以及我国的科技竞争力的重要力量，因此对于大学科研的绩效评价研究是十分有意义的。随着大学科技体制改革的不断深入和完善，科研评价己成为大学科研管理的重要组成部分。早期我国的科研绩效评价的是以定性评价为主，也就是同行评议法，请来该领域的专家以及行政人员共同评价一项科研工作的学术水平。近几年，为了提高评价水平，一些科研机构，以及大学开始引进国外的绩效评价理念，试图改善我国原有的评价体系。
      平衡计分卡((Balanced Score Card, BSC)是由美国的罗伯特·卡普兰和戴维·诺顿共同创建的一套企业业绩评价体系。相较于传统的绩效评价，BSC具有过程与目标并重、财务指标与非财务指标并重、短期目标与长期目标平衡的特点。本研究结合了我国大学科研现实情况及特点，吸取平衡计分卡的精髓，又加以修正，将其应用与大学科研绩效评价，构建了由科研经费与支出、研究实力、社会认可度、研究方向规划与人员发展4个层面，共18个关键绩效指标组成的基于修正BSC的大学科研绩效评价体系。
      本研究采取文献研究法、SPSS软件、问卷调查法和个案研究法，相关人员访谈，分析了我国大学科研的现状以及评价体系，并根据修正的BSC四个维度的内涵选定了适合该校的绩效评价指标，确定指标的权重，以便为最后评分奠定基础。在确定了指标和相关的权重之后，收集相关指标数据，确定评价标准。接下来是对该评价体系进行应用研究。此评价体系一定程度上可以用来作为大学科研绩效评价的参考标准，促进科研管理的水平和能力的提高。
      本文借鉴了企业绩效管理里的BSC模型，通过对大学科研工作愿景的分析，找到了基于修正的BSC的大学科研工作的四个评价层面，定性和定量评价相结合，构建了大学科研绩效评价体系，并通过应用研究，完成了对这一体系的应用过程，检验了该评价体系的优点与不足。
关键词:绩效评价;大学科研;平衡记分卡
Abstract
      Nowadays, the idea of performance management in the enterprise has been popular  and  achieved  good  results.  However,  performance  management  in universities is still in the stage of trial. Presently, university is one of the most important power of scientific research in China, and its level and research grade has always been the focus in science and technology. University is an important force to enhance the overall strength of scientific research, as well as the competitiveness of China's science and technology. Therefore, the evaluation of the study for scientific research and performance in universities is very si加ficant. With the Continuous deeping and improvement of science and technology reform in universities, scientific evaluation has become an important part of the scientific management in universities. Our former evaluation of scientific performance focus on qualitative evaluation, in other words, it is peer review law, which means inviting experts and administrative staff together to evaluate the level of academic research. In recent years, in order to improve evaluation level, many research institutions and universities have started to introduce foreign evaluation ideas to improve the existed evaluation system.
      Balanced Score Card is the most popular strategy management tool in the world at present. The BSC was created by Robert Kaplan and David Norton. Compared to the traditional performance evaluation, BSC has such Characteristics as following: balance of process and goal, equality of financial indicators and non-financial indicators,  balance  of  Short-term  goals  and  long-term  goal.  Based  on  the characteristics of the Balanced Scorecard university research performance evaluation system, this article combines the reality of China's university research and features, revising the BSC and building a staff from research funding and expenditure, research strength, social acceptance, research planning and staff development, Altogether four stratification planes, 18 key performance indicators composition based on BSC university scientif c research achievements appraisal system. In this paper, literature study, SPSS statistics soft, questionnaire, case study and interview are applied. It has analyzed the current situation in China's colleges and universities concerning research evaluation system } and selected for the school's performance evaluation by BSC. And then, it determines their ratios in order to lay the foundation for the final score. After determining the indicators and related weight, we need collect data for indicators to determine the evaluation criteria, and do some applicable research for this evaluation system. To a certain extent, this evaluation system can be used to be a reference standard for universities as a performance evaluation of universities for scientific research and promote capabilities of scientific research and management.